BBC worst in Europe for HDTV quality
Written by Chris Forrester
Thursday, 11 February 2010 12:39
The BBC Trust is now involved in the complaints about the declining quality of the BBCâs HDTV signal. Hundreds of viewers have officially complained, many arguing that the BBCâs images are failing in their core remit to âadhering to, or seeking to exceed, industry standards for picture resolutionâ.
In December Andy Quested, the BBCâs HD Principle Technologist, went on line in a formal BBC blog about HDTV with a series of answers to viewer complaints, and which failed to address many of the grumbles. The BBCâs head of HD, Danielle Nagler, has admitted that the BBCâs HD output is now only 9.7 Mb/s, significantly down on its initial 19 Mb/s broadcasts, and this â say the BBCâs critics â is at least part of the reason why images are softer and lack the âWowâ factor of true HD. BSkyB uses up to 19 Mb/s per multiplex for its top quality HD coverage (and generally operates its sports HD within a range of 15-17 Mb/s).
A formal complaint by Paul Eaton, who has been gathering data on HDTV, to the BBC Trust alleges that Ms Nagler accepts that the BBCâs âmediocre picture quality is acceptableâ and âin accordance with the BBC Trustâs remit for the HD channelâ. Ms Nagler did herself few favours by foolishly admitting on the BBC programme Points of View that: âThereâs no evidence that reducing the bitrate has an impact on picture quality or that there is an absolute relationship between bitrate and picture quality.â She has since retreated from the debate, saying âI feel that it is now time to draw a line under my further contribution to the debate here.â Emma Scott, the managing director of BBC-backed Freesat, has called it a âa bit of a geek issueâ and thus implied it is unimportant to the BBC.
The BBC Trustâs remit for its HDTV service states: âBBC HD should deliver a very high quality technical service to viewers, by adhering to, or seeking to exceed, industry standards for picture resolution.â
Mr Eaton, in his formal complaint to the BBC Trust, says that BBC high-def transmissions are some 20% below those recommended as the HD minimum by the European Broadcasting Union, and as such should not be described as HD.
Eaton includes in his submission contributions from many informed viewers who question the reasons and excuses given by the BBC for their output. Additionally he points out that the BBCâs pixel output â at least one method of calculating quality â is 25% below âFull HDâ (at 1.55m pixels per screen, compared with more than 2.07m pixels on âfull 1920 x 1080â HD.
In fact, says Eaton, the BBCâs British HD bitrate output is the lowest in Europe, lower even than the much-criticised Channel 4 HD, and lower even than the BBCâs own BBC HD Europe feed (at 16 Mb/s in full HD at 1920 x 1080). Eurosport HD comes out best in Eatonâs submission.
Eatonâs formal complaint to the BBC Trust ought to have been answered within an obligatory 20 working days of its Dec 30 submission. The BBC Trust is promising an answer âsoonâ.
© Rapid TV News 2010-02-11